Teaching Philosophy

Olivia stood at the front of a classroom with a PowerPoint showing the words u0022data visualisation group 4u0022

My research is in Biomedical Engineering and my teaching spans a range of science subjects; my recent teaching has focused on software engineering, system design, and data visualisation, this year I am teaching Biomechanics. I have taught: undergraduates from all years, masters students and 1st year DPhil researchers.

Most of my students are from subject areas similar to my own, although this year I taught on the Vice Chancellor’s Colloquium on Climate Change (VCC), an interdisciplinary program for students from all subject areas, so I had to adapt to teaching students from other disciplines who are familiar with different styles of teaching that I have not previously experienced. The VCC also gave me the opportunity to co-teach alongside a theologian, giving me new insights into the teaching approaches of other disciplines.

My teaching philosophy focuses on ensuring learning is accessible to all, to achieve this I use active learning techniques. As a learner, I find Active learning leads to stronger involvement in classes, better recall, and deeper engagement with concepts. Students have been shown to value participating in active learning [1] [2], Active learning has improved examination scores and decreased failure rates, This is true for all class sizes, but small classes benefit the most [3], making active learning particularly suited to Oxford’s modes of teaching. Active learning also inherently uses higher-level objectives under Bloom’s taxonomy [4] [5].

I use principles of universal design of learning to ensure that all students have the opportunity to fully engage in the lesson. In my first interaction with students, I encourage them to inform me if they have additional requirements to ensure that my teaching includes them. I also encourage students to feedback to me at any point if they do not find my teaching inclusive, so I can work to improve. I was pleased to see that my VCC students all felt that I made my teaching welcoming and inclusive (See Teaching Feedback), although I will continue to work to maintain/improve this level of Inclusion in my teaching.

References

[1] A. Lumpkin, R. M. Achen and R. K. Dodd, “Student Perceptions of Active Learning” College Student Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 121-133, 2015.

[2] P. L. Machemer and P. Crawford, “Student perceptions of active learning in a large cross-disciplinary classroom” Active Learning in Higher Education, vol. 8, no. 1, 2007.

[3] S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, S. K. Michelle, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt and M. Prat Wenderoth, “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics” Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8410-8415, 2014.

[4] B. S. Bloom, M. D. Engelhart, E. J. Furst, W. H. Hill and D. R. Krathwol, “Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals”, New York/London: David McKay Company/Longmans, Green and co, 1956. [PDF]

[5] S. Tabrizi and G. Rideout, “Active Learning: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy to Support Critical Pedagogy” International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 3202-3209, 2017.

Scroll to Top